In 2026, I've moved away from traditional SEO and towards something I think matters more: authoritative content. The world of search has always shifted quickly, but AI has changed everything at a different speed. Consumers are now presented with AI-generated summaries before they ever reach a website. Paid advertising takes the space beneath. Organic clicks — the ones small businesses depended on — are getting rarer and more expensive to chase.
The answer, as I see it, isn't to fight that. It's to become the kind of source that AI draws from. That means producing content with real depth, genuine expertise, and original thinking — material that earns trust from both humans and machines. Less about chasing algorithms. More about building a reputation worth citing.
That shift didn't happen overnight. Here's how I got here.
It Started With Google Adwords
Around 2001, I came across an e-book promising a system for making money online through Google AdWords. I never bought it — I found what I needed elsewhere — but I quickly discovered that for every £3 spent, I could return around £12 through mobile phone affiliate schemes. That asymmetry hooked me.
It didn't last. Affiliate programmes started banning brand names and high-converting keywords, building their own PPC operations. But by then I had the bug. Whatever came next would involve search.
The SEO Journey Learning On The Job
The learning curve was steep but manageable back then. Misinformation existed, but it wasn't as saturated as it is now. Before long, my websites were ranking — across MSN and Yahoo as much as Google, which hadn't yet dominated UK search the way it would.
My mistake in those early years was spreading too wide: too many websites, too many niches, not enough focus on building one or two properties that would last. I also used live sites for testing — the "what happens if I try this?" approach. And I stuck rigidly to a policy of not fixing what wasn't broken. That mindset would cost me later.
By the mid-2000s I'd moved from self-employment into running two Ltd companies — a digital agency in Middlesbrough delivering SEO and training for local businesses. This was a period of output over experimentation. Things were working. No reason to change..
The Algorithm Changes That Changed Everything
In 2012, Google began rolling out updates that would reshape the industry. Panda arrived first. Then Penguin. The early versions barely touched my sites — which, in hindsight, created a dangerous sense of security. One site had over 500,000 computer-generated pages. It felt untouchable.
It wasn't. Successive updates gradually bled traffic until a Penguin update took a 7,000-visitor-a-day website down to 700. The numbers didn't recover. I started winding down client work while I figured things out. It felt wrong to keep working for others when my own house wasn't in order. One by one, clients went — except the one based next door to my office.
Recovery testing took months. What became clear was that the investment required to reclaim those rankings far outweighed the return. The sites that had taken the top spots were large brands spending heavily on niche forum placements and link acquisition. Competing with that as a lead generation operation wasn't economically viable.
Closing The Agency
FOKM Marketing Ltd was voluntarily closed — no debt. I took time abroad to get some distance from it, with a rough plan to return in a year or two. It became four years.
During that time, I tested consistently — some of it focused on Panda and Penguin recovery, most of it on ranking without backlinks (which Google claimed was possible; in my experience, it largely wasn't). Content became the main focus. More of it, better structured, more genuinely useful.
A Different Kind of Return
The turning point came in 2016 when Google moved Penguin from a manual push update to a continuous rolling process. Sites that were cleaned up and improved started recovering faster. I began to see movement on old FOKM websites I hadn't touched in years.
That was enough to pull me back in — but differently.
Where I Am Now: Content, Authority, and AI As A Tool
What I returned to wasn't the same SEO I'd left. The signals that Google rewarded had changed. Technical tricks and link schemes had diminishing returns. What actually worked was content that demonstrated real knowledge, real experience, and real usefulness to the reader.
That realisation took years to fully trust — because it cuts against the instinct to find an edge, a lever, a shortcut. But the businesses I've watched pull ahead consistently aren't the cleverest technically. They're the ones with the best content.
AI arrived into that context. And my position on it is simple: it's a tool, not a replacement for thinking. The same way a calculator doesn't make you a mathematician, AI doesn't make you a writer or a strategist. What it can do — when used with discipline and genuine subject expertise — is accelerate the research and drafting process without replacing the judgment that makes content worth reading.
The author is still human. The expertise is still real. The editing, the restructuring, the voice — that's where the value lives, and that's where I spend most of my time.
The future of search belongs to businesses that become primary sources: organisations with genuine expertise, original perspective, and content deep enough that AI can reliably draw from it. That's what I help build.
See how I approach it → Freelance Authoritative Content Writer
Just what is it and does it work? Is it worth the effort?
Are these good for SEO, or do they harm?
How getting the right strategy first time, saves time and money.
For those who want to do things in-house, a 1 day course.